Dea Moneta
login
Banner Artemide 55E

Results from 1 to 30 of 30

Lot # 528 - Ostrogothic Italy. Non-Regal Bronze Issue from the Period of Theoderic and Athalaric. AE Follis. Early to mid 6th century. "Countermarked" early Imperial bronze issue. XLII (mark of value = 42 Nummi) cut into obverse of AE As of Augustus (Rome mint, 15 BC). Obv. Illegible traces of legend. Bare head of Augustus right, XLII cut before. Rev. CN[PISO CNF III VIR AA]A FF around large SC. For undertype, cf Augustus RIC 382. AE. 11.26 g. 28.50 mm. R. Rare and interesting. Green patina. Undertype F; mark of value VF. These countermarked issues have long been considered as made in Vandalic North Africa, but the hoard evidence and the results of the latest studies makes it seem that they were, in fact, made in the Ostrogothic Italy, and were in use there during the first quarter or first half of the 6th century (Cf, NAC, May 1993, 457). The mark of value XLII refer to a twelfth of a silver unit valued at 500 nummi, which itself amount to the 24th fraction of a gold solidus valued at 12,000 nummi. (Cf. Grierson, MEC, p.28-31). These are not countermarked coins in the usual sense of word, since the LXII figure was not punched or stamped with a single instrument, but seems to have been cut or incised with several chisel strokes. (C. Morrisson,1983). J. Friedlander suggested that for the more finely incised series the pieces were certainly softened by fire in order to be able to engrave more easily the deep and crude strokes. (“Die Erwerbungen des Konigl. Munzkabinets vom 1.Jan.1877 bis 31 Marz 1878” ZfN VI, 1879, p.1-26). Such crude workmanship seem to point to the markings being done by private persons, at least in the case of the most anomalous countermarks. While for the more finely incised countermarks – like our outstanding example – the role of some official authority cannot be excluded. (C. Morrisson). Tentatively, Morrisson suggests that an official practice of marking and re-issuing older bronzes was followed with varying success by private individuals as and when they came into possession of similar pieces. The only paper devoted solely to these countermarked coins is : Morrisson, C. “The re-use of obsolete coins : the case of Roman imperial bronzes revived in the late fifth century” in: ed. C.N.L. (Brooke et al. Studies in Numismatic Method presented to Philip Grierson, Cambridge 1983).XLVI, 487.
Lot # 547 - The Gepids in Sirmium. Imitative AR Quarter Siliqua in the name of Anastasius I (491-518). Obv. DN ΛNΛƧTΛƧIVƧ PΛV. Pearl-diademed and cuirassed bust right. Rev. IVINVICΛ [ ] I S(horizontal) . Monogram of Theoderic; above, cross; below, star. Cf. MIB 46; Cf. Demo 69-78. AR. 0.47 g. 15.00 mm. RRR. Very rare. Sound metal and broad flan. Brilliant and lightly toned, with iridescent hues. Edge break, with fragment missing, otherwise good VF. While coins of this type were first attributed by Brunsmid to the Gepids, Stefan later proposed an Ostrogothic mint at Sirmium has become the most accepted. The incompatibility of the weights of these issues with the Ostrogothic weight standard established under Theoderic, as well as the stylistic and epigraphic similarity with other Gepid issues struck in the names of both Anastasius and Justinian I, led Metlich to conclude that the whole so-called “Sirmium” group is, in fact, Gepid. The Gepids were a sub-tribe of the Goths who began arriving in Dacia in the AD 260s, and spread throughout the Balkans before invading Italy in the wake of collapsing Roman power in the late 5th century AD. For the most part, the Gepids were merely vassals of the greater Ostrogothic or Hunnic tribes, but from AD 454, when they defeated the Huns at Nadeo, to AD 552, when they were displaced by the Lombards, the Gepids possessed a state of their own in the region of the Carpathians and around Sirmium. Very rare silver siliquae and quarter siliquae are attributed to the Gepids during this period.

Results from 1 to 30 of 30