Banner Status International 406

ARMENIA MINOR. Mithradates. Satrap, circa 212 BC. Bronze Tetrachalkon (5.33g). Head left, wearing bashlyk / Bee. Kovacs 295. Dark green-brown patina. VF. Very rare. Kovacs assigned this very rare and puzzling coin to Armenia Minor, seeing its wearer's bashlyk and the Aramaic legend as pointers to a satrap rather than a fully fledged king, in line with parallels from Arsakes I in Parthia and Artaxias in Armenia. Earlier, however, W. Museler had suggested a different story, linking the piece to the Persian noble Mithradates III of Cius, who escaped Antigonus' purge in 302, carved out a base in Paphlagonia, and later emerged as Mithradates I Ktistes of Pontos. In that scenario, the Aramaic would sit comfortably beside the issues of Ariarathes I of Cappadocia, who likewise moved from satrap to king. The bee reverse, more at home in 4th-3rd century contexts than in later periods, quietly supports Museler's view, even though the catalogue here still follows Kovacs' traditional attribution. For the type and similar condition see; Nomos Auction 18, lot 241, hammered USD 2,200. (P)

Dritto moneta Rovescio moneta
Dritto Rovescio
Lotto n. 10061
GREEK. ARMENIA MINOR. Mithradates. Satrap, circa 212 BC. Bronze Tetrachalkon (5.33g). Head left, wearing bashlyk / Bee. Kovacs 295. Dark green-brown patina. VF. Very rare. Kovacs assigned this very rare and puzzling coin to Armenia Minor, seeing its wearer's bashlyk and the Aramaic legend as pointers to a satrap rather than a fully fledged king, in line with parallels from Arsakes I in Parthia and Artaxias in Armenia. Earlier, however, W. Museler had suggested a different story, linking the piece to the Persian noble Mithradates III of Cius, who escaped Antigonus' purge in 302, carved out a base in Paphlagonia, and later emerged as Mithradates I Ktistes of Pontos. In that scenario, the Aramaic would sit comfortably beside the issues of Ariarathes I of Cappadocia, who likewise moved from satrap to king. The bee reverse, more at home in 4th-3rd century contexts than in later periods, quietly supports Museler's view, even though the catalogue here still follows Kovacs' traditional attribution. For the type and similar condition see; Nomos Auction 18, lot 241, hammered USD 2,200. (P)

Estimate: AUD 1000